Saturday, May 29, 2010

Lenovo tablets, smartbooks delayed for Android

(Credit: Lenovo)
A pair of the most-anticipated mobile computers from this year's CES show were Lenovo's U1 Hybrid and Skylight smartbook. Both ran a custom widget-based Linux OS (sometimes also called Skylight), and were powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon CPU. But since then, both devices seem to have fallen off the map, and now we think we know why. Both systems are getting a software overhaul, jumping to the Android platform in search of better performance and more usability.
We've been hearing for some time that both systems were being tweaked far beyond their original expected Spring 2010 debuts, and more recently, that Google's Android was being considered as a replacement OS. That now appears to be Lenovo's official line, as we've heard, and other news sites are also reporting, that the versions of the Skylight and U1 Hybrid we got our hands on at CES will never see the light of day. Our understanding is that the Skylight will almost definitely be reworked with Android, whereas the future of the U1 Hybrid, with its clever detachable tablet screen, is more up in the air.
The Lenovo U1 Hybrid. (Credit: CNET/Scott Stein)
Back in January, we got to use both devices, and though we liked the hardware and design, the software experience was definitely lacking. The interfaces looked great, but performance was slow and stuttered. A the time we chalked it up to the devices' early prototype status, but apparently Lenovo was never able to get them to work as smoothly as expected. And with the Apple iPad redefining consumer expectations of tablet and app-driven devices, the bar was set even higher.
What this means for the future of the consumer tablet market and the still largely hypothetical smartbook market remains to be seen. We still think both systems have a lot of potential, and if they need Android to complete the picture, we're all for it.
New York native Dan Ackerman, a former radio DJ turned journalist, has written about technology and music for publications including Spin, Blender, The Hollywood Reporter, and USA Today. He hosts the weekly Digital City podcast and the New York edition of Editors' Office Hours. Dan's new album, Tales Out of Night School, is available now. E-mail Dan.

Government relaxes visa norms for IT cos

|
Visa-big.jpg
Indian governmenet relaxes visa norms for IT cos
NEW DELHI: In a major relief to over $60-billion IT industry, the Manmohan Singh government has relaxed employment visa norms for the sector allowing companies to hire foreign nationals as per their requirements. This effectively removes the ceiling of 20 such employees per company.

The ministry of external affairs has circulated new guidelines to all missions abroad informing them of the relaxation in procedures for IT and ITeS companies.

“It (the relaxation in norms) addresses concerns of the country’s IT and ITeS industry related to the employment visas,” said Raju Bhatnagar , vice president (BPO and government relations), Nasscom.

Technology companies that sponsor foreigners to work here will need to give a declaration that the skilled worker has been hired for and IT or ITeS company or to work in a Software Park of India or and special economic zone dedicated to information technology or an IT unit in a multi-product zone.

On the other hand, the foreign worker being sponsored will have to give a declaration to the effect that his annual salary is in excess of $25,000 per annum. The salary cap is being introduced to ensure only highly skilled workforce comes into the country, a government official said.

Last year, the labour ministry had, in consultation with the home ministry, introduced a number of changes in the visa rules after it found that there were thousands of Chinese workers, including low-skilled ones like cooks and masons, employed in power and steel projects being executed by Chinese contractors.

Do Facebook's new privacy settings let it off the hook?


Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg takes the stage Wednesday morning at a high-profile press conference he called to talk about privacy controls.
(Credit: James Martin/CNET)
There was a distinct tension in Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg's rhetoric as he unveiled major changes to the massive social network's much-maligned member privacy controls in a press conference on Wednesday.
On one hand, he said that the demand was there from concerned members and lawmakers to do something about confusing privacy settings and changes to how members' data is used in the wake of its F8 developer conference. On the other, he repeatedly insisted that the social network's nearly 500 million users do, in fact, want to share information rather than keep things as private as possible.
Facebook's new privacy controls, which will be rolling out "over the next few days or weeks" according to Zuckerberg, may very well quell some of the fears that members have had about how the company handles the vast amount of personal data stored on its servers. A post on the Facebook blog details them in full: As expected, the centerpiece of the changes is a single page for setting Facebook information visible to just friends, friends of friends, or the Web at large.
Crucial to this is Facebook's acknowledgment that on a member's profile, not all information is equal with regard to sensitivity. "When we went through our December privacy transitions, we asked everyone to make all their information open to everyone," Zuckerberg said, referring to the last round of changes to its privacy policies late last year.
"There are really big buckets of information that should be available to each field (on the new privacy settings page)." For example, he said that personal contact information is something that members will probably want to restrict to their friends. Photographs would presumably be shared with friends of friends. Twitter-like status updates about eating cheeseburgers, meanwhile, could go out to the Web at large.

A screenshot of Facebook's new privacy controls page.
(Credit: Facebook)
By the numbers, a lot has been done. Previously, there were 50 settings that members would have to tweak in order to make all information private; now, it's more like 15. The number of Facebook "privacy center" pages has dropped from 13 to eight. There's even a way to opt out of all Facebook Platform third-party activities entirely (though, it should be said, not advertisers). It's unlikely that many members will do this, considering the fact that it would block so many of the services that have kept Facebook members addicted to the site (like the popular game Farmville) as well as Facebook-powered log-ins on third-party Web services. But it's a sign that the pressure really was mounting, and Facebook knew it had to do something.
But the announcement was nevertheless tinged with a hint of, "Are you sure?" Zuckerberg dropped all sorts of factoids that pointed to members' desire to share more information rather than be closed off; he claimed that members are more likely to be fearful of the persistent false rumor that Facebook will start charging for subscriptions than of privacy issues, and that a drop in its algorithm-calculated word-of-mouth reputation following F8 was actually due to a change in the News Feed that displayed fewer updates from Facebook's wildly popular games.

"We are really going to try to not have another backlash."
--Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg
Whether members do, in fact, want to be more public than private, there are a few issues that still may plague Facebook once the privacy changes have gone live. The first is that much of the hullabaloo surrounding Facebook's recent changes wasn't necessarily the changes themselves, but how easily and willfully the company could make a major turnaround in user experience. Some members still may not trust the company out of a concern that this could happen again all too easily. True, Zuckerberg assured in the press conference that "we are really going to try to not have another backlash" and that "this is the end of the overhaul that we're doing." But this may not thoroughly convince concerned users.

Second, though some privacy groups have already released statements to express their approval ("Facebook is finally friending privacy again," the American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California cheerfully asserted in a press release, and the Progress and Freedom Foundation called the new tools "powerful" and said "Facebook has employed a potent weapon to deal with marketplace apprehensions: self-regulation"), there has not yet been word on whether D.C. lawmakers, like a coalition of concerned senators or the Federal Trade Commission, will agree with them. Some critics have said that rather than being opt-out, sharing data with third parties on Facebook should be opt-in in the first place. Considering how much this would undermine the power of Facebook's developer platform, it's unsurprising that Facebook doesn't want to do this.Third, Facebook has officially been thrown onto a big international stage with regard to privacy and security, and anything it does in the future that puts its integrity or safety in question will become a major story whether its privacy controls are a success or not. It was far more of a story than it would have been a year ago when Facebook investor Jim Breyer's account was compromised by a hacker, or when user data was sent to advertisers in what Facebook says was an accidental leak. What would have been a niche security-news story, particularly if Facebook patched the problem quickly, is now of global interest.
"I started Facebook when I was 19 and it's amazing to look back at how it has evolved," Zuckerberg, who recently turned 26, wrote on the company blog. "There have been a lot of changes over the years as we've continued to innovate, and I appreciate that you have all stuck with us. Each time we make a change we try to learn from past lessons, and each time we make new mistakes too. We are far from perfect, but we always try our hardest to build the best service for you and for the world."
At the very least, he seems to be well aware of the fact that he sure isn't in college anymore.
Caroline McCarthy, a CNET News staff writer, is a downtown Manhattanite happily addicted to social-media tools and restaurant blogs. Her pre-CNET resume includes interning at an IT security firm and brewing cappuccinos. 

Wednesday, May 19, 2010

New clue to anti-matter mystery

A US-based physics experiment has found a clue as to why the world around us is composed of normal matter and not its shadowy opposite: anti-matter.
Anti-matter is rare today; it can be produced in "atom smashers", in nuclear reactions or by cosmic rays.
But physicists think the Big Bang should have produced equal amounts of matter and its opposite.
New results from the DZero exeriment at Fermilab in Illinois provide a clue to what happened to all the anti-matter.
Continue reading the main story
Many of us felt goose bumps when we saw the result
Stefan Soldner-Rembold DZero co-spokesperson
This is regarded by many researchers as one of the biggest mysteries in cosmology.
The data even offer hints of new physics beyond what can be explained by current theories.
For each basic particle of matter, there exists an anti-particle with the same mass but the opposite electric charge.
For example, the negatively charged electron has a positively charged anti-particle called the positron.
But when a particle and its anti-particle collide, they are "annihilated" in a flash of energy, yielding new particles and anti-particles.
Similar processes occurring at the beginning of the Universe should have left us with equal amounts of matter and anti-matter.
Yet, paradoxically, today we live in a Universe made up overwhelmingly of matter.
Unexplained result
Researchers working on the DZero experiment observed collisions of protons and anti-protons in Fermilab's Tevatron particle accelerator.
They found that these collisions produced pairs of matter particles slightly more often than they yielded anti-matter particles.
The results show a 1% difference in the production of pairs of muon (matter) particles and pairs of anti-muons (anti-matter particles) in these high-energy collisions.
"Many of us felt goose bumps when we saw the result," said Stefan Soldner-Rembold, one of the spokespeople for DZero.
"We knew we were seeing something beyond what we have seen before and beyond what current theories can explain."
The dominance of matter in the Universe is possible only if there are differences in the behaviour of particles and anti-particles. 
Physicists had already seen such differences - known as called "CP violation". But these known differences are much too small to explain why the Universe appears to prefer matter over anti-matter.
Indeed, these previous observations were fully consistent with the current theory, known as the Standard Model. This is the framework drawn up in the 1970s to explain the interactions of sub-atomic particles.
Researchers say the new findings, submitted for publication in the journal Physical Review D, show much more significant "asymmetry" of matter and anti-matter - beyond what can be explained by the Standard Model.
If the results are confirmed by other experiments, such as the Collider Detector (CDF) at Fermilab, the effect seen by the DZero team could move researchers along in their efforts to understand the dominance of matter in today's Universe.
The discovery presages results expected from another experiment, called LHCb, which is based at the Large Hadron Collider near Geneva.
LHCb was specifically designed to shed light on this central question in particle physics.
Commenting on the latest findings, Dr Tara Shears, a particle physicist at the University of Liverpool who works on LHCb and CDF, said: "It's not yet at the stage of a discovery or an explanation, but it is a very tantalising hint of what might be."
Dr Shears, who is not a member of the DZero team, added: "It certainly means that LHCb will be eager to look for the same effect, to confirm whether it exists and if it does, to make a more precise measurement."

Yahoo acquires Associated Content to bolster local news

Yahoo has bought a user-generated news site, Associated Content, in a bid to better connect with its users.
The web giant hopes the deal will create "avenues for advertisers to engage with consumers".
Associated Content has more than 380,000 contributors who receive a market-determined fee for stories they write.
The deal means Yahoo may be able to bolster its traditional news content with independently produced material.
Crowd sourced news Luke Beatty, Associated Content founder, said: "Combining our crowd sourced content with Yahoo's distribution, world class editorial team and online marketing leadership will accelerate our growth".
The site, which calls itself "The people's media company", says it offers content on more than 60,000 topics, ranging from product reviews, through how-to advice, to very local news.
It has proved to be a popular destination for web surfers, with more than 16 million unique users per month, according to comScore.
Associated Content is one of a range of upstarts, such as rival Demand Media, which pay a share of revenue to contributors who produce content for which there is demand on the web.
Yahoo hopes the deal will help bring its advertisers together with relevant local news and information from Associated Content.
The portal has struggled in the last few years, losing advertising revenue to rivals including Facebook and Google.
The financial terms of the deal were not disclosed, but media reports indicate the price tag for Associated Content was around $100m (£70m).

Saturday, May 15, 2010

Spanish judge who indicted bin Laden suspended

Tosamajudge216.jpghe Spanish judge who became an international hero by going after Augusto Pinochet and Osama bin Laden was suspended Friday for allegedly abusing his authority by investigating what is arguably Spain's own biggest unresolved case: atrocities committed during and after its ruinous Civil War.

The punishment could effectively end Judge Baltasar Garzon's career.

The unanimous decision by a judicial oversight board, the General Council of the Judiciary, was made during an emergency meeting about Garzon, said its spokeswoman, Gabriela Bravo.

Supporters chanted, cheered and clapped later as Garzon emerged from the nearby National Court, where he works. He hugged co-workers and appeared to be holding back tears before getting into a bulletproof limousine and riding away.

Garzon, 54, famous worldwide for his cross-border justice cases, has been removed from his post pending his trial on charges of knowingly going beyond the limits of his jurisdiction in 2008 by investigating the execution or disappearance of more than 100,000 civilians at the hands of supporters of Gen. Francisco Franco during the 1936-39 Spanish Civil War or in the early years of the Franco dictatorship.

Until Garzon acted, there had been no official probe of such atrocities, which were covered by an amnesty granted by Spain's Parliament in 1977, two years after Franco died, as the country moved toward reconciliation.

Spain's current Socialist government, which has generally been supportive of Garzon, said it respected the judiciary watchdog's decision but insisted he is innocent until proven guilty. "The process is not over," Deputy Prime Minister Maria Teresa Fernandez de la Vega said.

Some say Garzon's legal woes also have resulted from anger about the way he operated. Fellow judges accustomed to discretion in the judiciary system appeared to be fed up with his aggressive, headline-grabbing style and his status akin to that of a rock star among his most fervent fans, many of them living overseas in areas such as Latin America.

Garzon's critics also said he had a spotty record in winning convictions in high-profile cases and sometimes cut procedural corners.

The judge is under investigation in two other cases as well: one involving money that a Spanish bank paid to sponsor human rights seminars he gave while on sabbatical in New York a few years ago, and another in connection with jailhouse wiretaps he ordered as part of a probe targeting the conservative opposition Popular Party.

The panel that suspended him Friday is made up of political appointees and deeply divided along party lines.

Garzon was indicted last month by the Supreme Court in the civil war case, and this week the court threw out a final appeal that could have spared him from going on trial soon. The judicial oversight body then had no choice but to suspend Garzon.

Even though the decision was widely expected, many in Spain are treating it as marking the end of Garzon's career, regardless of what the verdict in the trial might be. Garzon's lawyer, Gonzalo Martinez-Fresneda, said as much a few weeks ago.

Earlier this week, Garzon requested a leave of absence from his post at the National Court to accept a job offer at the International Criminal Court in The Hague. This was seen as an effort to shield himself from suspension.

A subcommittee of the judiciary board met Friday evening to see if the suspended Garzon can be allowed to take up that job without resigning from his post in Madrid but it postponed a decision.

As the group deliberated, some 500 people gathered outside the National Court to protest the suspension, blocking traffic and chanting slogans against fascism and in support of the judge and justice for the victims of the Franco repression.

Garzon shot to fame after having Pinochet arrested while the aging former despot was visiting London in 1998, and trying in vain to have him extradited to Spain for trial over torture and other abuses committed during his dictatorship in Chile. With that he was credited with ushering in a new era in international law.

Garzon also indicted bin Laden in 2003, and Spanish colleagues took on cases involving abuses in such faraway places as Tibet and Rwanda.

As a result, Garzon's name became synonymous with the concept of universal jurisdiction -- the idea that some crimes are so heinous they can be prosecuted anywhere. But extraditions have been rare, and there has only been one conviction, that of an Argentine "dirty war" suspect in 2005.

And after receiving complaints from countries targeted in such Spanish probes, such as Israel, Spain changed its law last year so that these cases now require a clear link to Spain, such as Spanish victims.

On Friday, human rights groups lamented how Garzon is being treated.

"Judge Garzon's suspension will be mourned by human rights activists around the world. Garzon helped to deliver justice for atrocity victims abroad, and now he's being punished for trying to do the same thing at home," said Reed Brody, legal counsel for Human Rights Watch.

Garzon has denied any wrongdoing in the civil war case and said his probe was legitimate. He said Franco-era crimes amounted to crimes against humanity.

If convicted in the civil war court case, Garzon would not face jail time, but he could be removed from the National Court for up to 20 years.

Garzon did not speak publicly Friday. But the day before, at a Latin American human rights conference, the clearly crestfallen judge said: "One does not face complex decisions with optimism but rather with calm, with that calm that comes with knowing I am innocent."

"As a man who respects the law, all that is left for me is to take on tomorrow's decision by exercising my defense," he said.

Microsoft releases Office 2010 productivity suite to businesses

Microsoft Corp, the Redmond based software giant has introduced its Office 2010 suite for businesses, however, retail buyers have to wait until 15 June.

At present, the company has released two editions of Office 2010, called as Standard and Professional Plus, which would be available only to organisations with a volume licensing agreement.

It is reported that these editions are already available to the firms with a Software Assurance (SA) agreement since 27 April. Firms without SA can now buy through Microsoft resellers.

Unlike Microsoft Office 2007, the new suite is available only in three editions viz. Office Home and Student, Office Home and Business and Office Professional.

According to Microsoft, Office Home and Student will be available for £109.99 strictly for non-commercial use, while Office Home and Business, costs £239.99, feasible for small businesses. For businesses, the company has released Office Professional edition, which includes all the apps and technical support for £429.99.

Analysts predict that the new suite will help Microsoft to compete with Google in the online apps market.

Google admitted wrongly collected data over unencrypted Wi-Fi networks

Google has admitted that from the past three years it has wrongly collected information of the people, which have sent over unencrypted Wi-Fi networks. This issue came into limelight when German authorities asked to audit the data and they took photos viewed on Google maps.
Viewing these data, it was found out that Google has been mistakenly collecting samples of payload data from open networks. The admission will increase concerns about potential privacy breaches. It came into news that as soon as this problem came into the eyes of the Google they start collecting Wi-Fi information and segregated the data on its network.

Google has now been asking a third party to review their software which caused the problem and examine them precisely and what data had been gathered. Google in recent past has been failed to maintain people trust on them. It also signifies that how unprotected Wi-Fi networks are present today.

Himanshu Sethi / ITvoir Network.

Thursday, May 13, 2010

Wipro and Jainam Win Symantec 2010 APJ Partner Awards

 

Two Indian channel partners including Wipro and Jainam Technologies are the recipients of Symantec Corporations 2010 Asia Pacific and Japan (APJ) Partner Awards. This announcement was made at the inaugural Symantec Partner Engage 2010 Conference in Sanya, China.Wipro received the Symantec APJ Partner Innovation Award and Jainam Technologies was declared the APJ Security Partner of the Year. Wipro won the award for successfully demonstrating the value proposition of the Symantec storage portfolio to enterprises across large and mid-market segments.

Jainam Technologies was recognized for achieving a high number of Symantec security accreditations and displaying a consistent performance across the complete Symantec security portfolio.Symantec is focused on helping our partners in India maximize their sales opportunities and accelerate their profitability. Both, Wipro and Jainam have displayed commitment towards meeting customer needs by becoming their trusted advisors. We hope that this recognition continues to nurture excellence. They have performed consistently during tough economic conditions, by adding value to the customers, said Vineet Sood, head channels and alliances for India, Symantec.

The Symantec Partner Awards have been established to recognize channel partners that have demonstrated innovative delivery of services and solutions to customers during the past year and acknowledge their dedication and commitment to selling Symantecs security, availability and systems management solutions.

The criteria of selection is based on overall performance in revenue, deal registration, technical and marketing investments, customer service excellence and certification.

\"As an end-to-end IT service provider, Wipro aims to provide customers with the highest level of service, delivery and expertise across technologies and platforms. This recognition by Symantec acknowledges our efforts as experts in Symantec solutions and services. We look forward to our association growing stronger in the years to come,\" said Vice President, Infrastructure Technology Solutions, Wipro Infotech, Vikas Srivastava.

Symantec is a global leader in security solutions and to receive a regional recognition in this domain is a matter of honor for the Jainam team. We value Symantecs investment in training and tools for the channel and look forward to continued mutual success through this year, said Mehul Doshi, chief consultant and CEO, Jainam Technologies.

Saturday, May 1, 2010

Sensex lacklustre; realty, auto, IT, pharma surge

Stock Tips For Short Term

99% accurate Track Record Tips in Stocks Below 100 Rs

At 15.12 hrs IST, Nifty was hovering around 5270-5280 levels for most part of the day. It was a lacklustre session for the markets as Nifty failed to breach 5300 on the upside and 5250 on the downside. Realty, auto, IT, pharma, oil&gas and capital goods saw good buying in today's trade. BSE Metal index was the only index trading in red. BSE Midcap index was up close to 1%.
The Sensex was up 53.08 points or 0.30% at 17556.55, and the Nifty up 15.20 points or 0.29% at 5269.35. About 1696 shares advanced, 1269 shares declined, and 296 shares were unchanged.
BPCL, Tata Motors, Cipla, GAIL and HCL Tech were up 3-5%. Ambuja Cements, Wipro, Tata Steel, SAIL and ABB were down 1.5-3%.


Index heavyweight Reliance was trading at Rs 1,034.60 down 0.01% from its previous close of Rs 1,034.70. Refinery major HPCL was trading at Rs 316.95 up 7.11% from its previous close of Rs 295.90. Tech major Infosys was trading at Rs 2,748.30 up 1.55% from its previous close of Rs 2,706.25.
Hindustan Lever was trading at Rs 238.15 up 0.59% from its previous close of Rs 236.75. Cigarette major ITC was trading at Rs 265.40 down 0.51% from its previous close of Rs 266.75.

Top gainers on the BSE Midcap: United Phosphorous, Nirma, Indiabulls, JK Bank and Ashok Leyland were up 9-15%.

Top losers on the BSE Midcap: Pfizer, Allahabad Bank, Madras Cements, Simplex Infra and Yes Bank were down 2.75-3.5%.
Top gainers on the BSE Smallcap: Halonix, ICSA, Kemrock Industries, Lancor Holdings and Binani Cement were up 6-16%.
Top losers on the BSE Smallcap: Consolidated Construction, Panoramic Universal, Sundaram-Clayton, Shirpur Gold and Bata India were down 3.6-4.8%. 


 
 
back to top